惠灵顿 Essay 代写:结构良好的英语学习
ASSIGNMENT代写

惠灵顿 Essay 代写:结构良好的英语学习

2017-05-16 00:23

一个结构良好的英语学习者计划必须由一个多学科小组组成,包括教师、普通教育教师、教师、特殊教育教师和其他语言专家。Lau诉尼克尔斯案和教与学之间的多重联系也影响了课程的设计目的是逐步将学生纳入正规学校课程。1975、下列刘执政,卫生部,教育和福利(HEW)公布的政策,为学校解决学生英语能力有限(LEP),和公民权利的联邦办公室(OCR)是负责刘分辨率电荷。OCR指示学校关于学生将有资格获得帮助学习英语,有什么具体的措施来帮助他们,教师培训的类型应该有。1978,这个裁决是在Castaneda vs. Pickard的情况下进行测试,当父母(Roy Castaneda),两个墨西哥裔美国学生,在雷蒙德维尔独立学区提起(RISD),德克萨斯。卡斯塔尼达先生表示,学区实际上是歧视他的孩子,因为他的孩子被放置在一组教室的基础上的标准,种族和种族歧视。索赔是RISD未能建立双语教育计划帮助孩子克服英语语言障碍、政策,因此,作为学生,他们不能用英语在课堂语言的人竞争。Lau诉尼克尔斯案(1974)被引用为要求在该国学区采取必要的行动,以提供学生克服英语教育障碍的能力。卡斯塔尼达的观点是,没有测量真实的方式如果雷蒙德维尔独立学区的方法可以克服英语障碍。
惠灵顿 Essay 代写:结构良好的英语学习
A well-structured English Language Learner (ELL) plan has to be a whole-school and district-wide initiative created by a multidisciplinary team involving ELL teachers, general education teachers, staff, special education teachers, and other language specialists. The multiple connections between the Lau v. Nichols case and teaching and learning also affect the way curricula is designed to gradually integrate ELL students into the regular school program. In 1975, following the Lau ruling, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) published policies for schools to address Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students, and the Federal Office for Civil Rights (OCR) was in charge of overseeing the Lau resolution. The OCR gave instructions to school districts about how students would qualify to receive help learning the English language, what specific measurements to take in order to help them, and the type of training teachers should have.In 1978, this ruling was tested in the case of Castaneda vs. Pickard when a parent (Roy Castaneda), of two Mexican-American students, filed against the Raymondville Independent School District (RISD), in Texas. Mr. Castaneda indicated the school district was in fact discriminating against his children because his children were placed in a group of classrooms based on criteria that was ethnically and racially discriminating. The claim was that RISD had failed to establish policy for bilingual education programs that would help his children overcome an English language barrier, and thus, as students, they could not compete with native English language speakers in the classroom. The Lau v. Nichols Case (1974) was cited as a requirement for school districts in this country to take the necessary actions in order to provide students the ability to overcome the English educational barriers. The Castaneda argument was that there was not real way to measure if the Raymondville Independent School District's approach would overcome the English proficiency barrier.