ASSIGNMENT代写

阿德莱德Adelaide代写Essay:大量信息

2018-12-20 17:03

需要大量信息的一个例子是政府。由于英国政府的执政时间通常只有4-5年,因此需要实际的原始数据,以便在工党任期内规划和实施政策。实证主义地理学学者经常获得和分析这些数据(Rhind, 1981)。当然,我们必须小心,不能仅仅依靠这种定量研究,否则重要问题就会被忽视,从而得不到解决,但由于这种明显的分歧,实证主义完全支配地理研究的机会微乎其微。实证主义及其在人文地理学中的应用受到了广泛的批评。批判本身一般以哲学的客观性、概括自然及其对事实的肤浅渴望为目标。然而,我们需要实证主义和定量方法。这些假设同质性在许多方面存在缺陷的研究通常是全面的,但它们提供了许多机构需要的实际结果,而且它们可以在动态环境中快速响应变化的法律。综上所述,实证主义方法显然已经成为人文地理学研究的必要组成部分,但人文主义的一面不容忽视。要了解这个世界,光靠数字是远远不够的。在定量研究和定性研究之间取得平衡的必要性是显而易见的。关颖珊和沙瓦南声称,这两股势力之间的对抗不利于地理的进步,但实际上,意见上的分歧有利于地理学科,这一点值得争辩。批判和扩展导致了对地理的新的划分和理解,从而产生了更广泛的知识。
阿德莱德Adelaide代写Essay:大量信息
An example of where mass information is required is in government. With governments usually in power for just 4-5 years in the UK, actual raw figures are necessary so that policies can be planned and implemented within the party’s term time. Such data is often acquired and analysed by positivist geography academics (Rhind, 1981). Of course we have to be careful not to rely solely on such quantitative studies or else important issues will go unnoticed and thus unsolved, but thanks to the evident divide, there is little chance of positivism ever totally dictating geographical research.It has become apparent that there are many critics of positivism and its application to human geography. The critiques themselves generally target the philosophies objectivity, generalising nature and and its shallow desire for fact alone. Yet there is a need for positivistic and quantitative approaches. These often sweeping studies that assume homogeneity are flawed in many ways, but they deliver actual results that are necessary for many institutions, furthermore they can quickly respond to changing laws within a dynamic environment.In conclusion it is clear that positivist approaches have become a necessary part of research within human geography, but the humanist side cannot be ignored. Much more can be learned about the world than numbers alone can ever represent. The need for a balance between quantitative and qualitative studies is obvious. Where Kwan and Shawanen claim that the confrontations between the two strands are detrimental to geography’s progress, it should be contested that in actual fact the divide in opinion has been beneficial to the discipline. Critique and expansion have led to the creation of new divisions and understandings of geography, hence, wider knowledges.