Religion Essay代写:艾伦想改变管理
ASSIGNMENT代写

Religion Essay代写:艾伦想改变管理

2017-02-26 00:28

当时,艾伦想改变管理,这可能有助于财政部摆脱金融危机带来的不良影响。艾伦的建议主要集中在工人数量的减少和工人职位的重新分配上。工人的福利应减少,他们的工作长度的安全性应该丢失根据变化的建议。这种改变计划可以降低劳动力成本,但它引起了政治上的愤怒,公众也抗议改变计划。艾伦本人在议会委员会遭到反对党的盘问。在这种情况下,改变最终中止,人们可能会看到一个教训,改变可能是风险和决策时,领导人应该考虑更多的事情。 至于改变,人们首先需要弄明白的是为什么变革是必要的,它带来的好处是什么?。当人们争论变革的时候,他们需要说服别人,稳定是危险的,在大背景下,创新随处可见,如果刻板印象统治整个组织,更高的效率将永远不会产生。领导者的任务是给出改变是好的、必要的、变化的证据。变化必然导致电阻,其他人不知道变化的结果,并在更深的意义上,改变可能损害一些人的利益。变化有负面影响。它可能导致混乱的组织,员工的倦怠,这意味着该组织的员工将失去信心领导人的决定改变。Eric Abrahamson曾经指出,“重复改变综合征损害公司的能力做出进一步的改变”。领导者应该说服电阻可以而且必须克服。变化的结果将是有利可图的和可行的。为了说服别人,变革的领导者应该找出人们在谈论变革时愤世嫉俗的原因。一个因素是一些尝试改变的事实并没有取得一些巨大的成功。如果发生这种情况,员工可以愤世嫉俗。另外,在有变化的影响,同时在提供变化的方法(科特&施莱辛格,2008)。

Religion Essay代写:艾伦想改变管理

At that time, Allen wanted to make a change in administration which might help the ministry out of the bad influence brought by financial crisis. Allen’s proposal mainly focused on redundant the number of workers and rearrangement of workers’ positions. The welfare of workers should be reduced and the security of their working length should be lost according to the change proposal. This change plan could reduce the cost of labors, however it aroused outrage in politics and the public also protested against the change plans. Allen himself was grilled by opposite parties at a parliamentary committee. In this case, the change aborted in the end, people may see a lesson that change can be risky and when making decisions, leaders should take more things into consideration.
As for change, the first thing people need to figure out is why change is necessary and what benefit it can bring. When people argue about change, they need to convince others that stability is dangerous, in the big context, innovations can be seen everywhere, if stereotype rules the whole organization, higher efficiency will never come into being. Leaders’ task is to give the evidences that change is good and necessary and change can be dealt with properly. Change surely causes resistors, others do not know the outcome of change, and in a deeper sense, change may damage the profit of some people. Change has negative influences. It may lead to chaos with an organization, and employee burnout, which means employees in the organization will lose confidence in leaders’ decision on change. Eric Abrahamson once noted that “repetitive change syndrome harm a company’s capacity to make further change”. Leaders should persuade that resistors can and must be overcome. The results of change will turn to be profitable and workable. To convince others, leaders of change should find out the reasons that people are cynical when talking about change. One factor is the fact that some attempts to change have not achieved some great success. If this happens employees can be cynical. The other is that over-promising of the effects of change and at the same time under-delivering the methods of change (Kotter & Schlesinger, 2008).
  • 上一篇:没有了
  • 下一篇:没有了