澳洲拉筹伯代写论文:逃税的道德规范

2018-10-25 00:35

我们先来看看避税和逃税的道德规范。对于我们的伦理分析，我们将使用功利主义[6]方法和义务论[7]方法。功利主义的观点认为，避税的伦理道德在理论上无法确定，因为这种评估最终取决于政府的质量。后一种方法认为避税是一种不道德的行为，因为这种评估的结果会产生不合理的结果。虽然功利主义和义务论的方法并没有带来独特的结果，但这一检验表明，总的来说，偷税漏税是不道德的。避税合乎道德的唯一可能性是，政府预计会以一种不好的方式使用税收收入。A尽管存在其他相关的伦理学方法，但这两种方法都是研究最多、被检验最多的方法，在伦理调查中通常会带来值得信赖的结果，因此，它们适合于实现本文的目标。我们将讨论避税与逃税的异同，并描述最近两起避税案例。然后我们将使用功利主义和义务论的理论，以及这些理论如何应用于不同的避税方法。
澳洲拉筹伯代写论文:逃税的道德规范
Let’s first examine the ethics of tax avoidance and tax evasion. For our ethical analysis, we will apply Utilitarianism[6] approach and the Deontology[7] approach. The Utilitarianism approach states that ethics of tax avoidance cannot be determined theoretically because this evaluation depends, ultimately, on the quality of the government. The latter approach states that tax avoidance is an unethical behavior, since the result of this evaluation creates an irrational outcome. Despite the fact that the Utilitarianism and the Deontology approaches do not bring a unique result, this examination indicates that, in general, tax evasion is unethical. The only possibility in which tax avoidance would be ethical is when the government is expected to spend the tax revenue in a not good way.  Despite the existence of other relevant approaches on Ethics, these two represent the most studied and examined methods, which usually bring trustworthy results in an ethical investigation, and for this reason, they are appropriate to achieve the objectives of this paper. We will discuss the differences and similarities between tax avoidance and tax evasion, and will depict two recent cases of tax avoidance. Then we will use the theory about Utilitarianism and Deontology, and how these theories can be applied to different approaches of tax avoidance.

• 上一篇：澳洲拉筹伯代写Essay:办公环境和新技术
• 下一篇：澳洲拉筹伯代写Essay:怀疑态度